Answer:
$31. 15
Explanation:
From the question we are required to find the new stock price considering that no market imperfections or tax effects exist.
stock dividend = 22 percent
Amount per share = $38
At a a stock dividend of 22 percent, new share price would be
= $38(1 / 1.22)
= $31.15
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is B) the economy is at full employment.
Explanation:
Standardized budget which is also know as full employment budget , is used to measure the federal budget deficit or surplus , with the given tax rates and government spending. Here the assumption made is that the economy has full employment, and this is one of the major difference between standardized and actual budget . Also standardized budget would reflect any type of adjustment that has to be made in the actual budget. So therefore the only way that actual budget and standardized budget are equal is when they both have full employment present in the economy.
Answer:
b. both firms will reduce their price.
Explanation:
The Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem that lies inside the game theory where the player could attain the expected result by not deviating to the beginning strategy. In this, the strategy of the each player is optimal at the time when the other player decisions are relevant
So as per the given situation, both the firm should decrease their price
hence the option b is correct
The original investment amount was $ 68.56 then annual return on investment is 10 years was 7.20% interest.
What is investment?
Investment definition is assets invested in to build wealth and save money on bank, property and projects for specific time period of money.
PV is a present value, FV is a future value, i is interest, n is number of period
PV= FV/ (1 + i) n
PV= 1, 00,000 / (1+7.20%) 10
PV =68.5650014087
As a result, the original amount of investment is 68. 56
Learn more about on investment, here:
brainly.com/question/15353704
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50