<span>I would recommend crews of two workers. This type of crew size is easier to manage and prevents cluster. The workers can watch each other's backs without having to worry about looking out for too many other workers. This way they can help each other without losing sight of their own work.</span>
Answer:
C.Prepaid Insurance
Explanation:
Prepaid Insurance is the insurance amount paid in advance, so that company has a receivable because amount is not due yet. It will charged to expense account with the passage of time. Notes Payable, Unearned Revenue, Owner Withdrawals are classified as liabilities and capital contra accounts. So correct option is C. Prepaid Insurance.
It’s C) The geocentric orientation
I hope this helped out, have a nice day! :)
All economic questions and problems arise from <span>C. scarcity. scarcity is defined as the lack of resources and is the opposite of abundance. If scarcity such as famine is experienced by a country or nation, there arise questions why such state happened</span>
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.