X < = -3
y > = 0
x < = 4.....but all the shading is not here....
I wanna say A is correct....but if A is correct, there would be more shading in ur graph...but it is the closest
Answer:
1/19
Step-by-step explanation:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- 3n+6 (n = smallest)
- 3n (n = middle)
Step-by-step explanation:
The usual method for doing this is to let n represent the smallest one. Then the three integers are ...
n, n+2, and n+4
and their sum is ...
(n) +(n+2) +(n+4) = 3n+6 . . . . sum of 3 consecutive odd integers (n = smallest)
_____
Personally, for consecutive number problems, I prefer to let the variable represent the average value. If n is the average value of 3 consecutive odd integers, is is the middle integer. Of course, the sum will be 3 times the average:
(n-2) +(n) +(n+2) = 3n . . . . sum of 3 consecutive odd integers (n = middle one)
Answer:
9.5
Step-by-step explanation:
9.5x9.5= 90.25 which is the closest you can get without going into further decimals
Answer:
The length of legs lm, mn, and lk is 32 while that of kn is 36.
Step-by-step explanation:
The diagram is attached in the answer.
As both the angles are equal thus the two forms isosceles triangles. This is true because the converse of base angle theorem is applicable here. The theorem clearly states that when a trapezoid is divided by the diagonal, it forms two set of angles where m<1=m<2 and m<lmk=m<nmk
This leads the two set of legs such as
Or this could be written as
Now the remaining two sides are given as
as this form an isosceles triangle so
Similarly
Or
Now the perimeter is given as
Here perimeter is given as 132 so this gives:
So the four legs are of length as given below:
So the length of legs lm, mn, and lk is 32 while that of kn is 36.
