Answer:
Dear user,
Answer to your query is provided below
For the French, colonies were necessary because:
a. To establish control over natural resources and to ensure supply of raw materials and goods.
b. The French policy-makers wanted to educate the people of Vietnam, because they considered education as one way to civilize the “natives". They were driven by the idea of a ‘Civilizing Mission’, and considered it their duty to bring modern ideas to the colony and to reshape its culture and also to have an educated labour force.
c. The objective was also to develop these colonies so as to improve standard of living of the people and improving their purchasing power who would then buy goods leading to profits for French businessmen.
Explanation:
French troops landed in Vietnam in 1858 and by the mid-1880s they had established a firm grip over the northern region. After the Franco-Chinese war the French assumed control of Tonkin and Anaam and, in 1887, French Indo-China was formed.
The colonisation of Vietnam by the French brought the people of the country into conflict with the colonisers in all areas of life.
Answer:
<h2>I'm fine just let me know when you are welcome</h2>
Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson
- Lee regarded Jackson as his "right arm."
- Jackson earned his nickname in the First Battle of Bull Run
- Jackson was fatally shot by one of his own men (who mistaken him as the enemy) - at the Battle of Chancellorsville - and had his arm amputated.
- Lee sent a letter to Jackson, writing, “Could I have directed events, I would have chosen for the good of the country to be disabled in your stead."
Answer:
c.)skepticism
Explanation:
Skepticism defined as the word which is used in reference to a person or the word which defines a person's questioning attitude or doubt towards putative knowledge or belief.
Skepticism occurs in the context of philosophy.
But it can be applied to any pseudoscience, politics, religion.
The person when questions beliefs based on empirical evidence or scientific understanding is called scientific or empirical skeptic.
