Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
An intentional community being studied by sociologists would notice different behaviors, management, and relationships in each. The communities share common goals and interests which make them be together. In a way these communities help people grow and develop with the others inside it.
One way that scientist hope to use the recent knowledge gained about non coding RNAs lies with the possibilities for their use in medicine. I would expect to gain most from RNAs which is one of the scenarios for future research will be targeting siRNAs to disable the expression of an allele associated with autosomal dominant disease.
The answer is D I think I'm not sure
