Relating to or characteristics of Mali or its inhabitants
Answer:
The appropriate response is written below
Explanation:
This is completely normal. To perform the laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon uses CO2 gas to insufflate the abdomen and allow room to maneuver the laparoscopic instruments. Her husband's body will quickly and safely absorb the gas in a day or so.
Answer:
Trial westward expansion.
Explanation:
In old West America, trails werecommon means of travelling.
they were used by immigrants in the 19th century .
as a substitute to other means of transport it was widely concidered by the imigrants and its pioneers.
The immigrants started occupying the North parts of America .
The major parts of settlement were great Plains as part of the mighty overland migrations of 19th century.
They moved as aresult of major motives such as ,
- religious persecution,
- economic incentives.
This took place in the 19th century.
Hello
Credit unions<span> are not-for-profit financial cooperatives, whose earnings are paid back to members in the form of higher savings rates and lower loan rates. </span>Banks<span>are for-profit corporations, with declared earnings paid to stockholders only.
</span>
Hope this helps
Plz mark me as Brainliest
The Green Party candidate Ralph Nader (in)famously is part of the 2000 election because many people think that he siphoned votes from the Democrat candidate (Al Gore) which may have been a factor in Gore's defeat.
Here's a simplified view of what I mean. Let's say there are 100 people total. Now let's say the election is very close at 50 50. If any one person changes their vote, then the winner is decided. If a third party enters the race, then one of the original candidates will have their vote split. If Gore had 50 votes, but then lost say 20 of them to Nader, then he'll be left with 30 after all is said and done. Bush will still have 50 votes and this leads him to win the election.
Note: Gore won the popular vote, but lost the electoral college. The electoral college is the true deciding body that determines the president.
So based on the second paragraph, that's just one simplified example of how a third party effectively "spoils" the race. Of course, many could easily argue that a third party (or many more parties) is actually a good thing because it encourages many voices to join the political arena. Those advocates would say that having 2 parties leads to stagnation and lack of growth, not to mention lack of representation of everyone.
In short, many people think the third party candidate Ralph Nader redirected votes away from Al Gore which may have cost him the election. However, there may be other factors that contributed.