School and doing well to have a better life for my family and graduating to start my career
one con is that people who have a strong love and desire for guns will be angered and enraged because people will be creating laws or try to limit our use of guns. I know many people myself that love to use guns for sport or for the aesthetical value, and they are upset because people want to take that away from them. On some level I can agree that we need to control guns because of the outbreak of killings, and a family member of mine was a part of one of the recent shootings and thankfully, she is okay, but I too was angered by this. But I must keep in mind that not all people use guns to kill, because some just love the sport of it, but some do use it to kill. I think we should accept basic small guns like a handgun for sport, but if anyone ever asked for a bigger gun should be questioned because what person needs a gun so big? There SHOULD be a limit and I think only police should have big guns.
Answer:
what to obserb here i dodnt see any thing to observe
Relevance is ordinarily a necessary condition, but not a sufficient condition, for the admissibility of evidence. For example, relevant evidence may be excluded if its tendency to prove or disprove a fact is heavily outweighed by the possibility that the evidence will prejudice or confuse the jury.
