<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
Answer:
of mice and men
Explanation:
it's banned because how racist it is the vulgarity its poor Treatment against woman.
wow nice piece of work right here
did you write it or is it a quote?
First Person.
Second Person means someone near the main person is telling the story.
Third Person is an all knowing being who know everyone's thoughts and dialogues.
Answer:
Explanation:In Elie Wiesel's “Night”and Paul Rusesabagina's “From An Ordinary Man”, both the author's use of overall purpose, theme, and use of rhetoric help tell the stories of survivors. In these novels the theme I chose was racial prejudice, were it also gives a message racism and how far it could go.
hope it helps.
