Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Most of the Louisiana territory had been set aside for the Indians.
other western land was considered barren waste.
Answer:
yeah I agree. with you boy or girl
Answer:
B). False
Explanation:
John C. Calhoun advocated states' rights as a means of preserving slavery in the South
I think it means you either embrace greatness or resent it, but it could also mean Emotions like love, fear or even rage can fuel a person or destroy it.
