A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why. In this lesson you will learn about the use of peremptory strikes, as well as the laws designed to protect the integrity of the process.
While the process of selecting jurors may be too boring to be featured in popular T.V. crime dramas, any seasoned trial attorney will tell you that a trial can be lost or won in jury selection. So, what exactly makes the process so important? And how do attorneys pick the 'best' jury for each case?
The jury selection process, also know as 'voir dire', involves attorneys from each side taking turns picking the jurors they believe will favor their position over their opponent's. The term peremptory challenge refers to the practice of excusing potential jurors without providing a reason why. Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can't be fair. This is called a 'for cause' challenge.
If the government were to fit our needs most of the population would not get evicted, hence a stimulus check. That’s one reason
Answer: deductive
Explanation:
Deductive method is one of the methods of reasoning, in which the consequences are deducted using general principles. The theorems are deducted from the definitions and postulates. In this previously know facts are also taken into consideration while deriving a conclusion.
According to the given situation, applying the studies on the effects of computer use to hypothesize for the effects of smartphone use involves the use of deductive method of reasoning. As here, previous knowledge is used to deduce a conclusion that is to understand the use of smartphone.
The correct answer is A. The Magna Carta
Explanation:
In 1215, King John who was the ruler of England accepted to sign a document known as "The Magna Carta". In this important document, the king agreed to limit his power and protect certain rights. Indeed, through this document it was established the payments requested by the King should have a limit and some citizens (mainly noble citizens) had certain liberties including the right to own property. Moreover, this document is relevant even today because it was the base for other documents that protected civilians' rights.