1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
3 years ago
14

Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that

you have experienced “the art of compromise.” How will you describe to your neighbor what this compromise means?
Law
2 answers:
mash [69]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The art of compromise can be described as a solution or agreement to an argument or a disagreement between two (or more) parties where neither of the two parties gets what they initial wanted in full. However the two parties do end up having a beneficial outcome from the final decision as the solution of what they initially wanted. For instance say  you bought a box of cookies for you to bring to your friend's house to enjoy at a party. Later after some time at the party there was one cookie left, and you want to eat that cookie. However your friend also wants to eat that cookie, so instead of fighting for the cookie and only one of you end up happy. You cut the cookie in half making it into two cookies so that both you and your friend get what was wanted; just not in full.

julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Under the drug supply chain security act (dscsa) manufacturers now have to have product id on products they distribute in the su
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

The Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), was enacted by Congress on November 27, 2013. Title II of DQSA, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA), outlines steps to achieve interoperable, electronic tracing of products at the package level to identify and trace certain prescription drugs as they are distributed in the United States. This will enhance FDA’s ability to help protect consumers from exposure to drugs that may be counterfeit, stolen, contaminated, or otherwise harmful. These requirements will also improve detection and removal of potentially dangerous drugs from the drug supply chain to protect U.S. consumers.

Additionally, the DSCSA directs FDA to establish national licensure standards for wholesale distributors and third-party logistics providers, and requires these entities report licensure and other information to FDA annually.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which supreme court case did the U.S. supreme court rule that
olchik [2.2K]
Hey there!

The answer would be Bush V. Gore

Bush V. Gore was a decision in the United States Supreme court that settles a recount dispute in Florida’s 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000.


Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Si tu fueras un candidato a las elecciones del Perú ¿cuales serian tus pricipales decisiones? ¿Porque?
sveta [45]

Answer:

hola!! no soy de Perú pero te quiero ayudar pero no sé cómo es el gobierno democrático allá así que suerte con esa pregunta

6 0
3 years ago
What are some possible negative issues with the M'Naghter Rule? Select all that apply.
koban [17]

Answer:

A. Fails to distinguish between violent defendants and one that no longer pose a danger to society.

C. Fails to differentiate between mental illness that are temporary or lifelong conditions.

Explanation:

M'Naghten Rule is an insanity defense used by defendant's attorney to plead defendant not guilty of crime due to mental conditions suffered during the time crime committed.

M'Naghten Rule states that a defendant will be pleaded not guilty only under conditions when it will be proved that the mental condition of defendant was not right at the time when crime was committed and that he/she was not able to discern his/her actions as right or wrong.

The criticism received to the M'Naghten rule is that it fails to distinguish between defendants who pose threat to the society and those who do not pose threat any longer. Another criticism is that it fails to distinguish between mental illness that are temporary or conditions which are lifelong.

Therefore, option A and C are correct.

6 0
3 years ago
Can legal pratictioner be both advocate and judge​
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

I believe so

Explanation:

I have no clue I'm a high schooler who likes kpop and life revolves around sleeping 24/7

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Police officers can't make an arrest for every violation of law that is, they can't
    9·2 answers
  • Did natural law influenced the expansion of rights
    8·1 answer
  • Aristotle and Rawls have opposing views about the relation between justice and moral desert. What best characterizes the differe
    6·1 answer
  • What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
    7·1 answer
  • Adjust your rearview and side mirrors:
    10·2 answers
  • What can the government do to help promote the concept of private property?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the income threshold for self-employed workers to file a return?
    13·1 answer
  • The shift in Canada WW1 and after that year, PLEASE HELP VERY EASY WRITE A PARAGRAPH
    7·2 answers
  • The highway transportation system is made up of
    7·1 answer
  • How did saul become king
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!