1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
3 years ago
14

Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that

you have experienced “the art of compromise.” How will you describe to your neighbor what this compromise means?
Law
2 answers:
mash [69]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The art of compromise can be described as a solution or agreement to an argument or a disagreement between two (or more) parties where neither of the two parties gets what they initial wanted in full. However the two parties do end up having a beneficial outcome from the final decision as the solution of what they initially wanted. For instance say  you bought a box of cookies for you to bring to your friend's house to enjoy at a party. Later after some time at the party there was one cookie left, and you want to eat that cookie. However your friend also wants to eat that cookie, so instead of fighting for the cookie and only one of you end up happy. You cut the cookie in half making it into two cookies so that both you and your friend get what was wanted; just not in full.

julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Wwwuuuuzzzzz uuuuuuuuuuuuuupppppppppppp
lions [1.4K]
Wuuuuuuuzzzzzzzz upppppppp
8 0
3 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you drive in the city,there is a lot going on .which of the following a driver's must do?
AlekseyPX

Not drive impaired or fatigued

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What the Constitution provides among the branches of government?
Dima020 [189]

Answer:

  The constitution are provided among the three branches of the government are:

  • Legislative
  • Judicial
  • Executive

Basically, these three branches are provided to ensured the effectiveness of the rights of the citizen, which are provided by the government. These branches maintain their own responsibilities and power. Legislative branch are basically responsible for making the law, the judicial branch are responsible for law interpretation and the primary responsibility of the executive branch is enforced the law.

7 0
3 years ago
What is one power that both the federal and state governments share?
STatiana [176]

Answer:

Many powers belonging to the federal government are shared by state governments. Such powers are called concurrent powers. These include the power to tax, spend, and borrow money. State governments operate their own judicial systems, charter corporations, provide public education, and regulate property rights.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Give three reasons why or why not we should keep the Electoral College. And based on what you choose, tell me one reason for
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a requirement for clear legal writing?
    15·2 answers
  • In the lawsuit referred to where a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine, is suing the Federal Gov
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the British government need money after the mid-1700s?
    11·1 answer
  • Use your understanding of the policy process to put head steps in order.
    8·1 answer
  • Which unit of the military has 90% failure rate for their training recruits ?
    6·1 answer
  • There is this thing called the political compass test, you should check it out... here's mine
    11·1 answer
  • What are some ways for EMTs and paramedics to take care of their own mental health in a stressfulcareer? (Check all that apply).
    15·1 answer
  • HELP I NEED THIS ANSWER ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • How do you compare the influence of the citizens participation, political parties, and interest groups on federal and state poli
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!