1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
3 years ago
14

Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that

you have experienced “the art of compromise.” How will you describe to your neighbor what this compromise means?
Law
2 answers:
mash [69]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The art of compromise can be described as a solution or agreement to an argument or a disagreement between two (or more) parties where neither of the two parties gets what they initial wanted in full. However the two parties do end up having a beneficial outcome from the final decision as the solution of what they initially wanted. For instance say  you bought a box of cookies for you to bring to your friend's house to enjoy at a party. Later after some time at the party there was one cookie left, and you want to eat that cookie. However your friend also wants to eat that cookie, so instead of fighting for the cookie and only one of you end up happy. You cut the cookie in half making it into two cookies so that both you and your friend get what was wanted; just not in full.

julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?​
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime

8 0
2 years ago
The four major speed laws are the basic speed law, prima favor speed law, the maximum speed law, and the _
BigorU [14]

Answer:

Minimum speed law

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
The individual who proposed principles such as the power to govern should be from
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

help

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What does it mean when our court system is identified as a "dual court system?"
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

The court system is identified as a "dual court system," referring to the judicial system. The state and the judicial system have two parts. Each state has its judicial system solely based on that state and decides disputes that arise in their boundaries.

Explanation

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT intellectual property ?
    7·1 answer
  • After you swallow an alcoholic drink, the alcohol is absorbed ...
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is Not a symptom of a strong emotions A) impulsiveness B) Hostility C)Blinderss
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was the first instance or classifying cases as criminal or civil
    11·1 answer
  • Who is NOT typically found in the courtroom?
    13·1 answer
  • If you think anything from your vehicle Check just could affect your safety or ability to control your car , you should
    15·1 answer
  • What happens it a state court disagrees with a federal court?
    14·1 answer
  • The two systems of law in use today are the English common law and the....
    12·2 answers
  • vì sao lại phải quy định những nơi sử dụng lao động không được đình công tại điều 209 bộ luật lao động năm 2019
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describe the rule of four
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!