Throughout the last 30 years, there have been significant changes regarding the media that is used to reach the masses. Regarding Politics, parties have had to readjust their campaign budgets in order to reassign funds to other forms of media that were not present prior to the '90s like the internet and social media platforms.
Politicians must now enter the competition for the votes in these platforms. This is much more demanding, as the speed that information is propagated is numerous times much higher than it was before the internet. A misunderstood post may represent a significant loss in voters.
Answer:
So his final words were not just an acceptance that death was possible; or probable, even. They were an attempt to pass the torch; to keep the flame burning if - or when - he was killed. In preparing for death, he doesn't feel despondent. And in the end, he's providing an epitaph for the movement, as well as himself.
"The theme running throughout the speech is 'we have much to be proud of'. I read that as, even if I die, I have lived a good life. I have done my bit to bring us closer to the Promised Land."
Answer:
When Law came to France in 1714, he renewed his acquaintance with the nephew of King Louis XIV, the Duke of Orleans. The duke became Regent of France after the king's death in 1715. The regent served as ruler while the heir to the throne, five-year-old Louis XV, was still a minor. The duke recalled Law's financial prowess and sought his advice and assistance in straightening out France's financial mess left over from years of reckless spending under Louis XIV.
–"John Law and the Mississippi Bubble,"
Jon Moen
What made the Duke of Orleans seek John Law’s help?
Law was an important acquaintance of the new French king.
Law was known for being successful in the world of economics.
Law held economic control of another colony in North America.
Law was a regent, which was a major position within the French government.
answer is B. Law was known for being successful in the world of economics.
Explanation:
Americans were opposed to a national government because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals.
