I believe this depends solely on personal preference. A work of literature that you like may not be good to somebody else, so the way you feel about something makes it either good or bad. I believe I am pretty comfortable determining the quality of literature given that I have read a lot of books and have an overall grasp of each literary era throughout history. It can be easy to critique a text if you are knowledgeable enough about that particular era, style of writing, and general context, but it could also be quite difficult depending on the topic of that work.
Question 1: 3
Question 2: 3
Question 3: 1
Question 4: it is either 1 or 4. I'm not absolutely sure.
Question 5: 1
My school just did this play in January.
The best description of the relationship between the Osage and Navajo peoples and the natural world is this:
C. The Osage and Navajo have different views of the natural world. The Navajo revere the natural world, and the Osage fear it.
<h3>What is the best description of the two tribes?</h3>
The two native American tribes have different views of the world. While the Navajo people respect the natural world and are thrilled by it, the Osage people are scared that the natural elements might turn against them and punish them.
So, option C best describes their views.
Learn more about Native Americans here:
brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ1
