Answer:
#3
Explanation:
it uses punctuation correctly.
1. <span>present
2. </span><span>the past tense
3. </span><span>past participle
4. </span><span>present participle.
Hope I helped:P</span>
Answer:
Uncle Carlos believes that the policeman did not kill Khalil for racism, but because he was a drug dealer. Mav, on the other hand, believes that Khalil was a victim of racism, since he was not armed, carrying drugs or weapons at the time he was murdered.
Explanation:
Khalil. a black boy, was killed in a police approach while picking up a hairbrush in his car. The policeman hit Khalil with several shots, and Khalil posed no threat.
Uncle Carlos, a black policeman, does not believe that the policeman was acting out of racism, since Khalil disobeyed him and was a boy who, in fact, was involved in the drug tafico. However, Mav knows that Khalil was not on drugs or weapons at the time and that he suffered abuse of police authority, as well as racism.
The type of context that is different for both these two children is the social context.
<h3>What is Context?</h3>
In literature, context may be defined as the setting within which a work of writing is situated. It provides clarity and respective meaning to the intended message.
Social context illustrates the physical environment around us that can influence the way we behave and think literally.
The context of this question illustrates the situation of two different children from two different family backgrounds. One is living in an urban area with six older siblings, while the other is the only child living in a rural area.
Therefore, the type of context that is different for both these two children is the social context.
To learn more about Social contexts, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/4066509
#SPJ1
