the ___ has/have the power to declare the actions of the legislative and executives branch unconstitutional

History

2 answers:

emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago

7 0

The judicial branch has the power to declare actions unconstitutional. Hope this helped!

Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago

4 0

The Judicial Branch can declare an Executive Order (a Presidential Order) unconstitutional if it is presented to the court as part of a case or controversy.

While the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter of constitutionality, even US District Courts can overturn an Executive Order, as was the case with President Obama's moratorium on deep water drilling in the Gulf. The lower court's decision may be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, but in this instance it wasn't.

You might be interested in

Which was not a goal of the Nazi Party?

zubka84 [21]

-Creating a strong political and military aliance with France

^That was not a goal of the Nazi Party, Germany actually invaded France in 1940.

7 0

3 years ago

American History Section 11 BC / Module 12: 1989-Present (Days 166-180)

o-na [289]

Answer:

A, The ongoing conflict in Iraq caused both candidates to turn away from President Bush.

Explanation:

President Bush's war in Iraq wasn't popular when the election of 2008 was coming up. Many people were disapproving of President Bush. While McCain wanted to see the war come to a victory, he still distanced himself from President Bush.

7 0

2 years ago

Pls help! will give brainlist!<br><br> how did Samuel Gompers help the labor unions?

Debora [2.8K]

Answer: Gompers helped found the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions in 1881 as a coalition of like-minded unions. In 1886 it was reorganized into the American Federation of Labor, with Gompers as its president. With the exception of one year, 1895, he would remain president of the organization until his death.

4 0

4 years ago

Who was Spartacus and what did he do? *

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Spartacus was a Thracian Gladiator. He was one of the escaped slave leaders in the third servile war

6 0

3 years ago

Why was the Supreme Court’s decision on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians significant?

PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer is A

California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was a US Supreme Court landmark decision issued in 1987. It abolished laws which restricted gaming and gambling on Indian reservations. States desired to control gaming in reservations but this decision concluded that Indian gambling could only be restricted in states where all gaming activities were deemed criminal according to state law. It was considered unconstitutional, that the states tried to limit only certain type of gambling activities and not others.

6 0

3 years ago