Question options:
a. internal; external
b. external; internal
c. external; internal
d. internal; internal
Answer:
internal; external
Explanation:
The expectancy theory was developed by J.B. Rotter to explain why people behave the way they do. The theory suggests people take certain actions(behaviour) based on the outcome and value of that behaviour which has been informed by past experiences and learning.
Rotter classified people into two types: internals and externals. Internals according to Rotter are individuals who believe that happenings are a result of their own direct efforts. Externals, on the other hand believe things happen by such things as luck and cannot be controlled by them.
Multiple choice? But the answer would be a scale of any sort.
Answer:This species of grass would be classified as an INVASIVE species.
Explanation:
An invasive species is an animal or a plant that comes from another part of the world into another place where it is not originally from and it starts to grow or live there, invading the original or native species.
They are usually carried into other regions through ship ballast water and in most cases by people (through food from other countries or attached in clothes that were worn in another region)
The negative effect of these species is that can destroy the native species, cause extinction of the native species,harm the natural resources and affect how human use of these natural resources.
They are very competitive and can compete with the native species for limited resources hence they end up changing and disrupting the natural habitat of the native species. This affect the overall ecosystem and biodiversity.
Answer:
Thesis statement first
Explanation:
First Ian should have given his definition of the internet and then introduce the problem. He should then speak on all that is known and then speak on what is not known. After this he should have directed the audience to a hypotheis and then the thesis statement. Next he could show the video to the audience to let them now have an idea of what the entire purpose of the presentation was.
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
