1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
4 years ago
7

What is the system by which each branch of the federal government can restrain

History
2 answers:
olganol [36]4 years ago
8 0

The government structure separates powers from other branches through frames, which gives them the authority of checking and stopping other, branches in a meaningful way from destruction. The president could reject the laws created by the congress if they did bit meet the government standards

The convention of any constitution is based on the framers that debated the issue that led to the division of power between the branches so that every department will carry out the responsibilities cooperatively to accomplish their goals.

jekas [21]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Checks and Balances  is the correct answer.

Explanation:

One branch of the government can restrain the power of other branches by the system of checks and balances. This system is an important part of constitution, with this each branch of the government can limit the power of other branches. It prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful, and to balance the power between them.

 Example: The US congress is the legislative branch and have the sole power of declaring war with other nations, but the President of US is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. This creates a tension between both as congress can declare wars but cannot give order. The president can give orders but cannot declare war. And if any of one of these two branches tries to overstep its powers and limits, the other branch can correct it or put limits on it.

You might be interested in
The ______ was fought with ideas, words, and money.<br> Please help ASAP! Please and thank you!
iren2701 [21]
Cold War, hope this helps and it’s not too late
8 0
3 years ago
What was the main goal of the first crusade
almond37 [142]

was to capture Jerusalem from the Muslims

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the battle of bunker hill, General Howe and the British
max2010maxim [7]
After the Battle of Bunker Hill, General Howe and the British realized that this war with the colonists would not be easy. Along with this, General Howe realized that this war would cost a lot of British lives.

The Battle of Bunker Hill is remembered as a strategic win for the British. However, the American colonists are remembered for their efforts in this battle. The American colonists were able to stop the British advancement multiple times. It was not until the third time that the British were successful in taking over the hill. This resiliency by the unorganized and under-supplied troops should that the colonists would be able to put up a fight against the world's strongest military at this time.
8 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the fall of the Roman Empire with the fall of the Byzantine Empire. Describe at least one major similarity
Lesechka [4]

The main difference between the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire concerned the official religions they practiced. Whereas the Roman Empire was officially pagan up for most of its existence, the Byzantine Empire was Christian. The Byzantine Empire was the significant remnant of the Roman Empire that survived in southeastern Europe for a thousand years after the official fall of Rome in 476 CE. As noted, a key difference with Rome was that the Byzantine Empire was always Christian rather than pagan. This hardwired into Byzantium a lack of cultural openness to the kind of religious diversity that had helped classical Rome to expand and thrive.
Another important difference was the relative weakness of Byzantium vis-à-vis the Roman Republic's power in its heyday. While powerful in some ways, Byzantium did not function as a hegemonic cultural, political, and military superpower in the same way as did the classical Roman Empire. This had the downside of leaving western Europe vulnerable to attacks, particularly from Viking marauders, that would not have occurred under the Roman Empire, but this also created an upside in which the western Europeans were forced to create their own vibrant and flexible cultural, political, and military institutions and infrastructures in order to survive.
Byzantium remained crucially important, however, because it controlled Constantinople, the gateway to the Mediterranean as well the gateway to overland passages to Asia. This was a source of access to vital trade routes with the East that this remnant of the Roman empire safeguarded for western Europe. Unfortunately, however, unlike Rome in its heyday, Byzantium ultimately lacked military might to keep this territory from Muslim conquest.
7 0
3 years ago
What was a main reason that nativism existed in the United States at the end of the 1800s?
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

I need this answer too !!

Explanation:

HElP

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did progressives make America a better place or was it worse off?
    14·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences.
    14·1 answer
  • Write the main policy of hitler
    5·2 answers
  • What were the name of contracts the governments on during World War II with industry
    5·1 answer
  • Which level of government Cannot impose a tax on items exported from any state
    9·1 answer
  • What did a Jacob’s Staff do for the 16th century navigation
    13·1 answer
  • What year did hatshepsut become pharoah?​
    6·1 answer
  • Who opposed the draft and why?
    11·2 answers
  • How were the British Soldiers planning to prevent American colonists from fighting?
    9·1 answer
  • What jobs did women do in ww1?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!