Answer:
“Should” or “should not” depend on the cost rate of the option and the risk appetite of investors.
Explanation:
An option is a contract that allows investors to buy or sell instruments such as security, Exchanged Traded Fund or an index at a pre-determined price over a certain period of time.
If the option will cost the investor an additional $10,000 and it is the cost for an option of $10 million investment, then it cost only 0.1% additionally, but it can secure the position of this investment; then the investor should buy this option.
Vice versa, if the additional $10,000 is much more than expected profit, and even lower but significantly drop down the total profit of an investment; and the investor always wish to have a high profit regardless high risk; then he shouldn’t buy this option.
Dropping prices
Increased advertising
Comparing yours to competitors
Answer:
<u>X= $15,692.9393</u>
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Number of years= 30
Final value= 1,000,000
First, deposit $10000 for ten years (last deposit at t=10).
After ten years, you deposit X for 20 years until t=30.
i= 6%
First, we need to calculate the final value in t=10. We are going to use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^t-1]}/i
FV= {10000*[(1.06^10)-1]}/0.06= $131807.9494
We can calculate the amount of money to input every year. We need to isolate A:
A= (FV*i)/[(1+i)^n-1]
First, we need to calculate the final value of the $131807.9494
FV= PV*[(1+i)^n]
FV= 131807.9494*1.06)^20= 422725.95
We need (1000000-4227725.95) $577274.05 to reache $1000000
A= (FV*i)/[(1+i)^n-1]
A= (577274.05*0.06)/[(1.06^20)-1]= 15692.9393
<u>X= $15,692.9393</u>
The correct answer to this is either generalizing or generalizabilty. Both mean the same and can be used interchangeably. It is basically an ability to generalize something based on a specific finding. It's not only on a broader group though, as it can also be done for its impact on natural environments based on a smaller finding.
