If the MPC is 0.80 and disposable income increases from 32,000 billion to $37,000 billion, then consumption will increase by: B. $29,600 billion.
<h3>Increase in consumption</h3>
Using this formula=Increase in disposable income×MPC
Where:
Increase in disposable income=$37,000
MPC=0.80
Let plug in the formula
Increase in disposable income=$37,000 billion×0.80
Increase in disposable income=$37,000 billion×0.80
Increase in disposable income=$29,600 billion
Therefore consumption will increase by: B. $29,600 billion.
Learn more about increase in consumption here:brainly.com/question/6955443
<h3 />
Answer: The response options are wrong, those that correspond according to what I found on the internet are:
All of the following are necessary to calculate the total purchase price for a Municipal bond traded on a yield basis in the secondary market EXCEPT:
A. Coupon rate
B. Yield to Maturity
C. Dated date
D. Trade date
<u>The correct answer is "C. Dated date".</u>
<u>Option "C" is correct because to calculate the price of a bond it is not necessary the day of issuance of the bond, is enough with its YIELD TO MATURITY, RATE CUPON AND YEARS TO MATURITY.</u>
c is my answer to your question
Explanation:
and and I don't know if it's right or wrong
Answer:No, Lake source cooling is not economically advantageous.
Explanation:
The cost of the lake source cooling is S30 greater than the cost of the refrigerator.
Though the lakes source option will bring additional income of S2400 for ten years this will only reduce it's cost to S2900 and this is still higher than the total cost of the refrigerator option of S2,120.
The straight line depreciation option on both options will not change this decision since it will have the same effect on both options.
The lesson of sunk costs is to forget about the money that's irretrievably gone and instead to focus on the marginal costs and benefits of future options. A sunk cost is a cost that happened during the manufacturing of something else and there is no way to recover that money back if the item or service fails. These costs will happen no matter the decision or outcome of a situation so most companies do not factor in sunk costs.
