Answer:
Para empezar esta en inglés, deberia estar en la materia de inglés no en estudio sociales.
Explanation:
De la primera es la 2 y de la segunda es la 3.
Writing for the court, Chief Justice Earl Warren argued that the question of whether racially segregated public schools were inherently unequal, and thus beyond the scope of the separate but equal doctrine, could be answered only by considering “the effect of segregation itself on public education.” Citing the Supreme Court’s rulings in Sweatt v. Painter (1950) and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (1950), which recognized “intangible” inequalities between African American and all-white schools at the graduate level, Warren held that such inequalities also existed between the schools in the case before him, despite their equality with respect to “tangible” factors such as buildings and curricula. Specifically, he agreed with a finding of the Kansas district court that the policy of forcing African American children to attend separate schools solely because of their race created in them a feeling of inferiority that undermined their motivation to learn and deprived them of educational opportunities they would enjoy in racially integrated schools. This finding, he noted, was “amply supported” by contemporary psychological research. He concluded that “in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” In Bolling v. Sharpe he stated that racial segregation of schools violated due process of law, and, in a reference to the Brown ruling, noted that “it would be unthinkable that the same Constitution [which prohibits racially segregated schools] would impose a lesser duty on the Federal Government.”
Answer:
Multifaceted
Explanation:
There are a number of reasons that a native population might not be affected by diseases that plague the West here is an outline:
- Diet: The Western diet is has been notorious for being over processed and full of refined foods and too much sugar. Although, in recent years the healthy lifestyle movement has been taking off. Native populations also follow their own diet and most of the time it is free from additives and other harmful substances that make cause diseases.
- Lifestyle: Most Westerners live a sedentary lifestyle while other native populations are engaged in physical activity through out their life as a part of their daily living. Physical activity is key for a healthy body and healthy heart.
- Social Practises and cultural traditions: Social practises in the west almost always revolve the presence of food and lots of it. Over eating and having large amounts of food is not unheard of in these events and this is unlike many places in the world where food is consumed based on need and availability.
- Isolation: Isolated populations are just not aware of the other types of food and social practices that are common in the West. This lack of information is sometimes what saves these populations from also engaging in consumption of a harmful lifestyle
- Genetics/Medical practices: This is a key factor in diseases and the passage of traits to offspring. Often times in the West the medicinal practices are enough to preserve life and allowed passage of disease traits to offspring, in some native populations these genes are filtered out of the gene pool and disease resistant traits are passes along.
In conclusion, it is difficult to pinpoint a single factor that can influence disease prevalence in a specific population as the causes are numerous.
<span>For instance in the Moroccan crisis France claimed morocco, Britain agreed to this but Germany denounced it therefore there was tension between Germany and France and an alliance started to form between England and France.</span>
<span>Negative reinforcement.
An example of negative reinforcement could be your loud alarm clock in the morning. When the alarm blares, you are trying to avoid or escape hearing that loud noise early in the morning, so you are likely to increase the "stopping" behavior by shutting off your alarm.
Another example is the seatbelt indicator in your car. Whenever you are not buckled up, you hear an annoying BING-BING-BING noise. What stops the noise? You buckling your seatbelt. In this case, the seat belt alarm is a negative reinforcer because you are more likely to buckle up your seatbelt rather than hearing the seatbelt warning alarm.</span>