The below statements are what I believe about removing Monuments
- Why are we moving them (AKA taking them down)?
Are we just moving it for room? Why are we moving it? For room, for a building, is that honorable? No, I don't think it is
- Are we really thinking about the monuments use
If were removing a monument that has a significant meaning or remembrance of something, than that's disrespectful and why did we put it up in the first place
- Do the people like it, or not?
This kind of relates to the first answer. Are we just moving it to put in a building or something like that. If the government has decided to remove it, are they thinking about if the people like it?
There are my answers. Best of luck,
- Ari -
the source of sediment for the morrison formation is true
In Dredd Scott, the Supreme Court had a very particular issue to consider: that of whether or not an African American had standing to sue in federal court.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that while Scott was a citizen of a free state, he was not a US citizen and was not entitled to standing as a US citizen.
The correct answer is a. Non-material culture.
Non-material culture refers to beliefs, rules, customs, ways of thinking, ideas that make up a culture. They are not items you can hold or touch but rather ways of living, how we go about our daily lives. So going to get a haircut, visiting your dentist or taking public transport would all be examples of non- material culture.
It is to accomplish edification amid a period when it was thought to not be conceivable. The pure land is a custom of Buddhist lessons that are centered around Amitābha Buddha. Pure Land situated practices and ideas are found inside essential Mahāyāna Buddhist cosmology and shape a vital part of the Mahāyāna Buddhist conventions of Tibet, China, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan
