1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ale4655 [162]
3 years ago
5

The difference between intentional torts and torts involving negligence is that, in torts involving negligence, the tortfeasor d

oes NOT wish to bring about the consequence of the act, nor does she or he believe it will occur. T/F
Social Studies
1 answer:
s344n2d4d5 [400]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is T (True)

Explanation:

In law, a tort refers to a civil wrong or action against the law that causes harm or loss to another person and therefore should be regulated by law, especially concerning civil remedies. Additionally, torts can be classified as intentional if the action occurred intentionally which means the individual was aware of the damages or consequences of his/her acts or as related to negligence which means the civil wrong was not intentional, but occurred as the tortfeasor (person who commits a tort) did not consider possible consequences or was unable to avoid these consequences as it occurs in car accidents or collisions that cause other people damages but in most cases are unintentional. Thus, the statement presented is true as in torts involving negligence the tortfeasor does not consider the consequences of the act.

You might be interested in
Of the following, how do China and India most differ?
lakkis [162]
Net migration rates
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
URGENT I NEED HELP!!!!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND RATE 5 STARS PLS HELP!!!!
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Its Monarchy

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Confederacy’s best chance to win the war was to get _____________ patronage.
rewona [7]

Answer:

I think the answer is (Robert E.lee)

7 0
3 years ago
Stafford and warr's reconceptualization of deterrence theory is most compatible with which other theory?
Gnesinka [82]
<span>Mark Stafford and Mark Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence theory was first published in 1993. Their theory challenged the distinctions between specific and general deterrence and maintain that the same people are often subject to both specific and general deterrence. Stafford and Warr's theory of reconceptualization of deterrence is most compatible with the 18th century theories of Beccaria and Bentham. Both Beccaria and Bentham were philosophers concerned with legal and penal reform and challenged many of the distinctions of deterrence or punishment.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Please help I need this answered urgently. What is an elector? Please explain.
masha68 [24]

An elector is a person who has the right to vote in an election. For example, when you’re 18 you become an elector.

Hope this helps.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How were Korea and Southeast Asia hurt and helped by their nearness to china?
    6·1 answer
  • What was was the down fall of germany in world war 1
    10·1 answer
  • Which amendment addresses madison’s concern that unenumerated rights must be protected?
    9·1 answer
  • 11. I live in Michigan. I went to Iowa and killed someone. I then went to Florida for vacation. I got caught for the Iowa murder
    8·1 answer
  • All of the following are tenets of capitalism EXCEPT
    7·2 answers
  • Dr. Harbinger is studying a new psychotherapy treatment for depression. He carefully screens potential participants to make sure
    9·2 answers
  • Behavior that is statistically rare, behavior that deviates from the social norms, personal conditions that cause subjective dis
    11·1 answer
  • Among the three provinces of the human mind derived by freud that control and regulate impulses, the ____________ is the only pa
    8·1 answer
  • How according to malthus do wages and the availability of work influence population growth?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement about game rules is NOT true? A. Without rules, there is no competition. B. Competitors should accept penalties
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!