Chief of State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander-In-Chief, Legislative Leader, Chief of Party, Guardian of the Economy.
Commander-In-Chief would give a lot of power since it would allow the president to start war with practically any country.
The president has equal power to the other branches of the government. Every decision goes through the government branches and each one has equal say. They are always balanced in power.
Maybe Chief Administrator and Chief Diplomat would come into conflict debating foreign policy regarding federal government’s jurisdiction. Implications? They may not be at odds with each other exactly, but in some way it is very possible.
Common law as opposed to civil law is a judge- made law based on precedents. The key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of the English common law was the necessity of King Henry II to unify the country. He wanted to eliminate arbitrariness and some illegal practices, so he decided to send his judges to hear the disputes throughout the country. The verdict was recorded in a file called precedent.
Bimarck. Garibaldi and Mazzini were themselves revolutionaries, and while Cavour was a rightist he still bankrolled their campaigns.
It was horrible, they were treated very badly as slaves?!
