Answer:
She would have $280 left
Step-by-step explanation:
if this is what u were asking for and wanted pls give brainliest
Arlen already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has two pairs of congruent angles and a pair of congruent included sides, which meet the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
<h3>What is the ASA Congruence Criterion?</h3>
The ASA Congruence Criterion states that for two triangles to be considered congruent to each other, both triangles must have a pair of congruent included sides and two pairs of congruent angles.
Thus, the two-column proof that shows that RS ≅ TU that Arlen is trying to write, has already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has the following:
Two pairs of congruent angles - ∠RST ≅ ∠UTS and ∠RTS ≅ ∠UST.
A pair of congruent included sides - ST ≅ S.
These satisfy the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
Learn more about the ASA Congruence Criterion on:
brainly.com/question/11637992
22 is the outlier. Hope this helps!
Answer:
n = 1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Given ratio of 1 : n is equivalent to the ratio 4 : 6.
We can rewrite these equivalent ratio as,

Now we have to solve this expression for the value of n.


n = 
n = 1.5
Therefore, n = 1.5 will be the answer.