Answer:
If I wanted to leave the community I would ask to be released from it and if it was denied I would flee by the river.
Explanation:
"The Giver" presents a utopian society that, in an attempt to end any inequality in society, decides to monitor and make all the choices of society, including in relation to its professions and relationships. In chapter 6 of this book, we can see that it is possible to leave this community, if an individual wants to. In this chapter, we learn that there were cases of people who did not like the profession to which they were assigned and fled the community by crossing a river, but in this same chapter, we are informed that it is possible to lose a license to leave the community, if the individual does not want to do what you've been told.
The answer would be the 4th answer choice - after drafting - because it makes the most sense. Hope this helps.
It could mean put in danger
Answer:
Barbara's mistake was trusting the ad and not double-checking it to see if it was a scam or not. She just immediately started to enter her credit card information. She could've inspected the ad more and she would've seen it was fake. Barbara should cancel her credit card moving on and also learn a lesson about spending her money online. Next time if she wants to purchase a movie online, look at a site that has good reviews. This might help her out.
Explanation:
:)
The answer is: dangling modifier.
Dangling modifiers are separate from the word they modify, resulting in ambiguity, confusion or nonsense. In the example sentence, it is not clear which animal is walking the wire - whether the dog or the squirrel. Supposing the squirrel (which is about to fall) is walking the wire, a correct version of the sentence would be:
My dog waited for the squirrel to fall, which was walking the wire.
