PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!

History

2 answers:

s2008m [1.1K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

James I was king of Scotland (as James VI) before he became king of both England and Scotland. He acceded to the English throne upon the death of the heirless Queen Elizabeth I in 1603. James’s ensuing reign was a controversial one, in part because of many political decisions that Parliament and the public found vexing: he spent lavishly, summoned Parliament only once between 1612 and 1622, levied an unpopular tax on imports and exports without Parliament’s consent, and tried to forge an alliance with Spain, a kingdom regarded with enmity by most in England.

James I was not a popular king. Although he had ruled as king of Scotland, he was unprepared for the challenges he faced upon assuming the English throne. A slew of politically ill-advised decisions—from imposing levies to attempting to forge an alliance with Spain—put him at odds with Parliament and the public and were partially to blame for his unpopularity. Other factors included his Scottish origins (glaringly obvious from his thick accent), his cultivation of favourites (often also of Scottish origins), and his widely recognized attraction to other men (which may have led him to confer honours upon his favourites).

Explanation:

This is the best I can do:(

Luba_88 [7]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Stupid stupid stupid question.you should know this stupidhead.

You might be interested in

Jefferson wanted the united states to remain a nation of farmers. He saw in the west the possibility of accomplishing this goal

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

He signed the Treaty of Cession in 1803, completing the Louisiana Purchase.

6 0

2 years ago

How did Rome treat conquered people who lived peacefully?

Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

B. Roman governors left them alone.

6 0

3 years ago

"What avails, then, the folly of the painter, who from sinful love of gain depicts that which should not be depicted—that is, wi

hjlf

The people in the Byzantine Empire who disagreed with the position being argued with the quoted word would be called the <u>Iconoclasts</u>.

<h3>Who are the Iconoclasts?</h3>

Basically, an Iconoclasm means “an image breaking” and refers to a recurring historical impulse to destroy images for religious or political reasons.

For instance, in ancient Egypt, the carved visages of some pharaohs were obliterated by their successors and during the French Revolution, the images of kings were defaced.

Hence, the people in the Byzantine Empire who disagreed with the position being argued with the quoted word "<em>Those fall into the same blasphemy who venerate the image, and the same woe rests upon both.</em>" would be called the <u>Iconoclasts</u>.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.