1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
beks73 [17]
3 years ago
13

Read this excerpt from a 1936 speech in which President Roosevelt unveils the second phase of the New Deal.

History
2 answers:
Nataly_w [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

thus the answer is B hayahhhh~

Explanation:

Crank3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

He intends for the New Deal to benefit all Americans in many ways.

Explanation:

New Deal was a number of programs proposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to help deal with the economic crisis from the Great Depression that affected the US. The Deal was a plan to help revive the US and regain its economy and help the people.

In the given excerpt from the President's speech, he lists the things his new plan will work towards attaining- <em>"improve working conditions [. . .] provide useful work [. . . ] education [help disabled people . . .] protect the consumer against . . . monopoly and speculation."</em> These points show his intention to make the New Deal be beneficial for all Americans, from all backgrounds and all aspects of life.

Thus, the correct answer is the second option.

You might be interested in
24
UNO [17]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

Socialism is a reaction against the <u>A. in equal power between the worker and an employer</u>.

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

The socialism is a political theory which is mainly based on the ownership and the self-employment. It deals with the social and the economic systems. According to this theory, the ownership can be collective, public, or cooperative.  

This began during the French Revolution. The socialism lead to many theories such as economic democracy, socialist calculation debate, and so on. Karl Marx, German sociologist played a wide role in socialism.

3 0
3 years ago
Would you rather live under a fascist government or a communist government? Why?
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

communist, because in a fascist you are brutally oppressed while in communist, you have a few more rights while you own none of it.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast in the Mexican and the Brazilian revolution.​
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

All revolutions that exist or have taken place in this world are full of the revolution traits that were evidently pointedout throughout the book, Anatomy of Revolution written by Crane Brinton. One classification of the revolution that was mentioned in this piece of literature was, “A revolution is a drastic, sudden substitution of one group in charge of a territorial political entity by another group hitherto not running that government.” Some revolutions may approach this definition in a varied way. Many people think that revolutions only cause trouble and dismay. All the same, have you every considered of a peaceful revolution? Those two words “peaceful” and “revolution” may seem ironic together. Nevertheless, there is a severe illustration that had occurred in the past that proves the existence of this satirical phrase and the unique way of approaching a revolution: the Brazilian Revolution. In addition, I will be comparing the similarities that were showed among the Mexican Revolution and the Brazilian Revolution. Due to the reason of proving that the “peaceful revolution” is still considered an act of Enlightened citizens fighting for their rights. To start out, there are three major parts to the revolution, according to the reading that was in Anatomy of Revolution: cause, sequences, and the consequences. The cause of the revolution mostly states the basic ideas on whyand how the revolution sparked. In this case, Brazilian Revolution, the Portuguese all of a sudden appear out of the blue to the sacred land of Brazil. They were on their way from fleeing their country due to the attack of Napoleon. These unexpected people arrived at the land of Brazil and unbelievingly they start ruling over the natives. Of course the Brazilians were baffled by this action. The Portuguese start taking away the Brazilians’ privileges and rights. To illustrate, the Portuguese banned the Brazilians from trading with foreigners, growing crops or manufacturing goods that have the potential to compete with Spain. In yet another example, if we compare this event to the Mexican Revolution, even during the Mexican revolution, the Spaniards, who came to the land of Mexico

without warning started governing over the Mexicans. They used Mexicans as slaves and they received meager treatment and had to face the harsh reality. They gathered an unreliable amount of taxes from the natives, which, in the end,angered the lower statues and caused the revolt to take place. Even better, during the courses of the revolutions, both the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolutions created a contract of a constitution that had all the requirements of the radicals documented on it. At first, the rulers or the statue who was in absolute power, refused to sign or agree to the constitution. This lead to more riots and conflicts. Some revolutions, such as the Mexican revolution, created bloody wars and fights in order to gain the approval of their constitution. In other cases, such as the Brazilian Revolution, they cause no destruction on people’s lives and they did not carry out bloody wars-they decided to solve problems “peacefully.” After revolting a little more, the head ofthe conservatives decides to sign and be part of the contract, which leads towards the end of the revolution and this is the stage in which the radicals’ desires are fulfilled. In yet another example, the Mexican Revolution created the Inquala plan: whichcontained the three conditions: “One, Mexico would become an independent monarchy governed by transplanted king Ferdinand. Two, Creolles and Pennensulars would have equal human rights and civil liberties. Three, the Roman Catholic Churches could keep their privileges.” More precisely, the Brazilian Revolution created a petition that eight-thousand Brazilians signed, that asked King John to let his son, Dom Pedro, to rule this country. Eventually, Pedro gave the independence to the Brazilian, and he led theconstitutional monarchy in Brazil. Further more, in the end, or in the consequence, it seems that the rebels achieved what they were enthusiastic to posses. In much the same manner, both revolutions, the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolution, had a positive conclusion. Or in other words, they both gained freedom and independence, along with the equal rights and privileges they couldn’t enjoy and taste before. Taking these two revolutions as an example, you can realize that even a “peaceful revolution” canhave the same results as the violent revolution-the Mexican Revolution. Even though the two revolutions went through very similar, but very unique paths, their results were identical, which is all that matters in the end and the only thing that is taken credit

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

~Heaven~

6 0
2 years ago
What were some of the challenges of crowded Roman cities? Choose five correct answers.
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Risk of fire, lack of running water, potential for diseases to spread, inability to remove trash, lack of sanitation.

Explanation:

I meant C

4 0
3 years ago
The 1950 Supreme Court decision to ban “separate but equal” law schools in Texas
aliya0001 [1]

The case you describe is:  SWEATT v. PAINTER


Details:

The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).

Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into  the School of Law of the University of Texas.  Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time.  So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.

In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have  lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students.  The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.

In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education.  The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.  In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.  After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Aztec Empire decline?
    12·1 answer
  • In what ways did the British government attempt to reassert control
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following did NOT rise in the United States during the 1950s? *
    10·1 answer
  • For how many years did slavery last? For how many years did slavery last? 1 following 16 answers 16 Report Abuse Are you sure yo
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of Britain during most of World War II?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the relationship between the French and Algonquin lead to war?
    5·1 answer
  • A _____________ was a non-free person in Sparta who belonged to the polis and was forced to farm land.
    15·2 answers
  • In 2-3 complete sentences, describe how the explosion of knowledge during the Renaissance affected the Catholic Church and expla
    15·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the national industrial recovery act?
    6·1 answer
  • (02.04 HC)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!