Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
$21,800
Explanation:
The computation of 4-year revenue is as shown below:-
Bond Income of 4th Year = Face amount × Bond × 1 ÷ 2
= $500,000 × 8% × 1 ÷ 2
= $20,000
Interest Revenue = Bond Income + Amount of Discount Amortized
= $20,000 + $1,800
= $21,800
Therefore for computing the interest revenue we simply bond income with the amount of discount amortized.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost of any economic decision is the cost of giving up its alternative. We are aware that we have limited resources with alternative uses and we have to use these resources to satisfy alternative needs and wants. In order to increase spending resources on one thing, we need to decrease spending on its alternative.
Here, the parking spot on the driveway can be used for personal use or can be used for renting. The opportunity cost of using the spot for personal parking is the money that could have been earned by renting it to others.
Answer:
$15.64
Explanation:
first we must determine the market value of the bond without the warrants:
PV of face value = $1,000 / (1 + 3.5%)⁵⁰ = $179.05
PV of coupon payments = $25 x 23.45562 (PV annuity factor, 3.5%, 50 periods) = $586.39
market value = $765.44
the market value of the 15 warrants = $1,000 - $765.44 = $234.56
market value per warrant = $234.56 / 15 = $15.64
