The equation that has the same solution as 2.3p – 10.1 = 6.5p – 4 – 0.01p are as follows;
<h3>How to rewrite an equation? </h3>
2.3p – 10.1 = 6.5p – 4 – 0.01p
The equation that has the same solution as above can be found as follows;
2.3p – 10.1 = 6.5p – 4 – 0.01p
combine like terms
2.3p – 10.1 = 6.5p – 0.01p - 4
2.3p – 10.1 = 6.49p – 4
Multiply through by 100.
Therefore,
230p - 1010 = 649p - 400
learn more on equation here: brainly.com/question/26005958
#SPJ1
Answer:
1) (2, 3)
2) (2, -5).
Step-by-step explanation:
2x – y = 1
2x +2y = 10 Subtract to eliminate the 2x:
2x - 2x - y - 2y = 1 - 10
-3y = -9
y = 3.
Plug this into the first equation:
2x - 3 = 1
2x = 4
x = 2.
2)
5x – y =15
x + y = -3 Adding to eliminate y:
5x + x - y + y = 15 + -3
6x = 12
x = 2
Plug this into the first equation:
5(2) - y = 15
-y = 15 - 10 = 5
y = -5.
Answer: a. 
b. The population in 2032 will be 8292.
Step-by-step explanation:
Exponential growth equation: 
, where a = initial value , r = growth rate, x = time period
Given: a = 5054 , r= 0.02
a. Required exponential growth function: 
b. For 2032, x= 25
The population in 2032 will be 8292.
Most likely you are expected to recognize that side lengths 2, 3, 5 will result in a "triangle" of zero area (looks like a line segment).
The appropriate choice is
(5, 3, 2)
_____
Some authors write the triangle inequality as a + b ≥ c for any assignment of a, b, c to side lengths. The "or equal to ..." allows the triangle to have zero area (looks like a line segment). Other authors insist the inequality not include the "or equal to" case. It looks like your text's author is in the latter camp.
