Answer:
Explanation:
This type of determination compares a known sample to a glass fragment to see if the two samples came from the same source.
Glass can be made from a variety of different materials that differ from batch to batch. The presence of the different materials in the glass makes it easier to distinguish one sample from another. Also, the properties of glass can vary depending upon the temperature the glass is exposed to during manufacturing. Basic properties, such as color, thickness, and curvature, can also help to identify different samples of glass just by looking at them. Optical properties, such as refractive index (RI), are defined by various manufacturing methods. RI is the manner in which light passes through the glass. This can be measured easily even on small fragments of glass. These properties help to indicate that two samples of glass could be from the same source.
Clear and present danger test, says speech may be restricted if evidence exists that such expression would endanger the public.
<h3>What is a clear and present danger test?</h3>
The clear and present danger test stressed that
printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint.
Unless there is a danger created by that expression, this test was originated in Schenck v. the United States.
Learn more about clear and present danger test at;
brainly.com/question/24452126
Within 30 feet of any flashing signal, stop sign or traffic signal. In such a way that you block or create a hazard for other vehicles.
Answer:
No, Senator Thompson can not do this as all matters dealing with money must start in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Explanation:
The rule comes from the U.S. Consitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. If the bill was drafted in the U.S. House and passed the U.S. House Subcommittee, then passed by the full U.S. House, Senator Thompson could go around and ask other Senators to vote for the Bill, but he could not have written the Bill and have it start in the U.S. Senate.
