Answer:
From the question given, they are Check-able deposits, Savings and Time
Explanation:
<em>The three types or forms of deposits that savers make at banks from the highest return to the lowest return are as follows,</em>
<em>Check-able deposits, Savings, and time</em>
<em>Check-able deposits: is referred to as a checking account, were deposit account held at a financial institution that allows deposit and withdrawals or it is made of any request store account against which draft or checks of any kind might be composed.</em>
<em>Savings: These are income that are not spent by customers or deposit account held at a retail bank that pays premium yet can't be used specifically as cash in the feeling of a medium of trade. </em>
<em>Time: It can be defined as a deposit in a financial balance that can't be taken back for which notice of withdrawal is required or before a set date.</em>
Answer:
Re-register
Explanation:
GPS to help law enforcement recover stolen vehicles, there are many ways law enforcement agencies can implement GPS tracking to help prevent theft, stop crime, and catch criminals.
GPS tracking can also be used for tracking those under house arrest or for enforcing restraining orders. Convicted criminals serving time under house arrest can wear a tamper-resistant, GPS-enabled ankle cuff.
Some states have specific laws that allow judges and law enforcement to use technology in ways that are intended to protect victims of domestic violence. For example, law enforcement and courts can use Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology to track offenders who have committed domestic violence and stalking.
Answer:
Civil acts right of 1991
Explanation:
The civil acts right enforces laws to prevent unfair treatment during employment and on the job due to sex, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or age. Passed by Congress in 1991, this act advocates for fairness in employment matters and banned discrimination against the disabled in employment.
This preferential treatment of Jacqueline by Robert because she is African American goes against the 1991 civil act right.
Answer:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Explanation:
The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.
In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.
Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
