1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Monica [59]
3 years ago
13

Louis XVI when he born

History
2 answers:
UkoKoshka [18]3 years ago
4 0

23 August 1754

Palace of Versailles, France

Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
4 0

August 23 1754

hope this helps

You might be interested in
What was used to encourage people to help out with the war effort of world war one
Paraphin [41]
Propagandas, commercials, posters
8 0
3 years ago
What was the most important "cost"<br> of WW1? Why?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

The most important cost of WW1 were human lives, as millions of people died during the war and later from many diseases.

Explanation:

WW1 was the most brutal war until then, which devastated European continent.

Although, material costs were enormous, human casualties were even greater.

Only nine millions who died in the war, millions who were wounded and deeply hurt, many families, even many countries devastated.

5 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASE!!
madreJ [45]

Answer:

kjnkjfneknw

Explanation:e

kenkuewhjefnkjnegjkl22

8 0
3 years ago
How did the inventions of the industrial revolution change the economies of the North and the South?
maw [93]

It is probably more nearly correct to state that the Northern states offered more fertile soil for industrialization to grow and prosper than the South.  The comments above about slavery are misstated. The Southern economy was indeed agrarian and dependent upon slave labor; however the reason for this is was that the economy in that portion of the country consisted of large scale plantations of staple crops, primarily cotton.  It is manifestly incorrect to state...

7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the Aztec and Inca Empires. Explain at least three ways in which they were similar and three ways in which
dybincka [34]
Similarities:

Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents

Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.

Both empires had inherent instabilities

Both empires were fueled by corn.

Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.

Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation

Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.

Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.

Both empires provided public education

Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.

Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.

Differences:

The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age

THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico

The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.

The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu

The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued

The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.

The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier

The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads

The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.

The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.

The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.

Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.

The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What's the opposite of -2??
    15·2 answers
  • What is a protection found in the Florida declaration of rights in the Bill of Rights?
    10·1 answer
  • Why might theodore roosevelt push for reformers have angered some political leaders
    5·1 answer
  • What general term describes the practice of drawing conclusions from data about natural phenomena
    9·2 answers
  • Why were the Dust Bowl storms devastating to farmers?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the diplomatic efforts between mexico and the united states like?
    14·2 answers
  • Why should industries be systematized?
    10·2 answers
  • How did Islamic influence during the Middle Ages contribute to the Scientific Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • Ello <br>3 id ban h.o gayi <br><br>#kamina op bolte <br><br>✌✌✌✌✌✌​
    6·2 answers
  • How did traders and merchants solve the challenges that discouraged trade?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!