Hello there,
People were<span> spending money they didn't have, although they looked wealthy or well off, they weren't.
</span>
Hope this helps :))
~Top
I believe the answer you are looking for is the telescope. Hope I helped.
China has grown by more than 6 percent every year since the late 1970s, with rates that sometimes exceeded double digits and lifted the poverty of 700 million Chinese (using many other millionaires).
Decades of migration from the countryside to the cities have led to a large contingent of workers already earning the highest urban wages.
Migration would have made the rural labor market tighter, and the remaining rural workers would already have greater bargaining power to ask for higher wages.
The large public investments in backward infrastructure, as well as new social security and cash transfer programs.
President Ronald Reagan was anti-communistic. Before Gorbachev came to power, he used to profess his absolute abhorrence of the Soviet Union and would have nothing to do with them. But his views mellowed somewhat after Gorbachev, however, it did not mean he changed his views about communism but he was more concerned with the threat of nuclear weapons and he saw that it was possible to achieve peaceful relations with the Soviet Union, even though that peaceful relation took a long time to happen.
Answer:
I would argue that militarism contributes to imperialism, not the other way around. <em>But</em> I guess that imperialism could lead to the growth of armies in that it allows them to expand their forces through the natives from the area that they're imperializing.
A good example of this would be the British East India Company. British imperialism was especially prevalent in India during the 18th/19th century, and during that time they were able to create a presidency armies which were mostly made up of Indian sepoys.
