Answer:
The average number of times inventory is sold during the period.
Explanation:
Inventory turnover by definition is the relationship between inventories and the cost of goods sold by a firm. It measures on average, how many times the inventory was restocked and sold in the operating period.
A higher number usually suggests a healthier operation cycle for a business.
It is measured by,
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold / Average inventory
Option 1 and Option 3 are related to the performance of accounts receivables. Option 3 is the closest to above mentioned definition. Option 4 is only measuring the inventory clearance time.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
The correct answer here is d.
Explanation:
Real wage is the nominal wages adjusted for price changes. It reflects the purchasing power earned by the workers.
There will be a direct and positive relationship between real wages and number of workers who are willing to work. This means when there is an increase in the real wages, more workers will be willing to work because they will be earning more. Reverse will be the situation in case of reduced real wages.
Answer: -27.2%
Explanation:
The Real GDP can be calculated using the formula for calculating the Price Deflator which is the current price level for the year.
Price Deflator = (Nominal GDP / Real GDP) * 100
Real GDP = (Nominal GDP/ Price Deflator ) * 100
1929
= (103.6/11.9 )* 100
= $870.588
1933
= (56.4/8.9) * 100
= $633.70787
Percentage Change
= (870.588 - 633.70787) / 870.588
= 0.272
= -27.2%
GDP changed by -27.2% over the 4 year period between 1929 and 1933
Answer:
Lopezâs bonus expense is computed as $40,777. Therefore,
The Journal entries are as follows:
(i) On December 31,
Employee bonus expense A/c Dr. $40,777
To Bonds payable A/c $40,777
(To record the bonus due)
(ii) On January 19,
Bonds payable A/c Dr. $40,777
To Cash A/c $40,777
(To record the payment of the bonus to employees.)
Answer:
The answer is: decrease taxes by $100 billion.
Explanation:
If the real GD is $200 billion, which represents only 40% of full employment GDP, then the government should try to increase consumer spending either by decreasing taxes or increasing government spending, or a combination of both.
In this case, I chose the tax decrease since government have budget limitations and they can only decrease taxes by so much before hitting a deficit. Additionally, when you have a large tax reduction, usually government spending either stays the same or decreases.
If the government decreases taxes by $100 billion, the marginal propensity to consume shall result in a $75 billion increase in consumption. According to the Keynesian Multiplier theory, that $75 billion should generate additional production, creating a virtuous cycle that should increase the real GDP in a larger proportion.
