Firms classified as being part of the sharing economy and collaborative consumption are still considered too risky to attract substantial venture capital investment. True
Explanation:
Firms that are funded as a apart of the sharing economy are usually never as profitable as the private companies which draw more investors despite their continued success as their business models are not based on producing profits for the higher ups and have a much more horizontal structure in their firm of ownership and responsibility among the workers.
This means that their is less money in it for the investor and the administrator than it is in a top to down job which is usually the case in corporate and there is more assiduity on the work too.
Brenda is practicing stimulus control
Hope this helps, Happy Valentines day (:
Answer:
False because you only go and check your account you don't deposit anything only if you want
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Arbitration and mediation are two alternative ways of resolving legal conflicts, that is, they are alternatives to judicial litigation.
Thus, arbitration involves the selection of an impartial third party (similar to a judge), who will decide through an award who of the parties is right, basing his decision on law, morals, ethics or common sense.
For its part, mediation involves a negotiation between the parties, assisted by a third party, the mediator, who will seek to reach an agreement.
Both alternatives imply that a lawsuit is not initiated, which in itself entails a notable economic and time saving for the parties in conflict.
The way economists would probably explain the wastage of
this clam resource is by saying that clams are free goods and are therefore
subject to the tragedy of the commons effect. The tragedy of the commons effect
is a theory in economics, postulated by the Victorian economist William Forster
Lloyd.
The tragedy of the commons effect describes a condition
within a shared-resource system where each user act freely according to their
own self-interest, but their collective actions ends in the depletion or spoilage
of that resource, thus having a negative impact on the common good of all users.
In this case, commons is taken to refer to the clam resources.
