Extremely simple means very simple and great difference means big differ
I believe the answer is B Blockade runners
Its also known as the Stone age.
The Europeans scientists and writers century based the differences in appearance and behavior they observed between themselves and non-Europeans mostly on biological factors.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
According to several studies conducted on the human behavior and how it is different from society to society, it is concluded that the differences are based on biological factors that an individual is exposed to. But biological factor alone is not responsible, the environmental factors also come into play. Following biological factors, a particular behavior can be present in the said gene but it would be incorrect to say that the gene controls the behavior. Genes simply facilitate the traits passed on from parent to offspring but the environmental factors act as the stimulus to bring the behavior into action.
Same is followed for the difference in the appearance. Genes from the father and the mother to their offspring are responsible for their appearance. For example, the child of a mother with brown eyes is most likely to have the same color of eyes as the mother. The environment plays less role in this case as compared to the behavior.
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct
