Answer:
Cannon-Bard theory of emotion; James-Lange theory of emotion.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, if an individual sees a crocodile in the swamp he may be lead to feel fear whilst running away at the same time. This is explained by the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion. But, on the opposite side, we have the James-Lange theory of emotion which states that the individual would be afraid because they are, in fact, running away. Basically, the Cannon-Bard theory states that we feel physiological consequences (such as sweat, accelerated heart rate, etc.) when we feel emotions, whereas the James-Lange theory states the opposite: we feel an emotion when we have the physiological effect (we feel fear because we are running, sweating, with our hearth accelerated, etc.).
Answer:
It's egoist because it's imposed by an Almighty Power (God in this case), and even if you have the free will, one way or another, it's a condition to be good.
It's consequentialist because every choice you make, based on God's commandments, you will have a consequence, for the good or for the bad.
And finally, it's deontological because you are morally conditioned to choose, you don't have the option to put aside, it's a social convention to choose.
Explanation:
The Divine Command Theory address that everything that happens is based on the power and choice of an Almighty Power and humans are conditioned to choose. Even with the free will, the social and moral conditions demands a choice, that's why it's an egoist, consequentialist and deontological theory.
I’m pretty sure the answer is D :)
