Answer:
Adults work outside the home while children attend schools
Explanation:
With the Industrial Revolution, the Western societies experienced numerous changes. One of the biggest ones was that the population migrated from the rural to the urban areas, and the density of the population in the city increased significantly. As the migration was caused by the job opportunities in the industry, the people were working in the factories, thus out of home. Since the technology was constantly upgrading, the labor force for the future needed to have certain amount of education, so all the children where provided with education, and for that purpose numerous thousands of schools were open all over these countries.
Answer:
C) PATCO was a government union and was prohibited by law from going on strike
Explanation:
The law provide opportunities for union members to conduct a strike. But there are several requirements that they need to follow. First, The strike need to be peaceful. No properties destruction will be tolerated. Second, they have to give notice to their supervisors. Thirds, they should not report for work more than 48 hours.
Since members of the PATCO consist of Professional Air Traffic Controller that is paid by citizens' taxes, the action that they take directly influence normal citizens. (Not only the profit of a single company) . Not reporting to work for created major traffic delays around the country. They conducted their strike illegally and a lot of people have to experience economic damage due to their actions.
ang naging resulta ng nasabing rebolusyon sa serye ng mga kilos protest ng mga tao laban sa c pamumuno ni Ferdinand Marcos.
english translation
the result of the revolution in series they started to fight pf the people against
leadership dictates by Ferdinand Marcos
Answer:
his proposal for revenue sharing with the states
Explanation:
Nixon had ill feelings against the federal government, he grew under the New Deal and as a member of the Republican Party, he opposed Keynesian measures fiercely.
His revenue sharing proposal gave more financial flexibility to states, while at the same time reducing the federal government money and therefore its ability to enact large policies like the New Deal.
