Well the male bird is a dominant (long beak) and the female is a recessive(small beak.) we can assume that the female birds genotype is ii and the male birds genotype is LL or Li. When it comes to the offspring we can assume that the offspring would have a long beak. The offspring would either have the dominant (father) genes.
About 160 years. After Charles Darwin came out with his theory people have been debating it.
Answer:
the model failed to account for the changes in the appearance of the inferior plants.
Explanation:
The model was a geocentric model that was based on the refraction. Though the theory was sound it did not provide a full truth about the orientation of planets in space. Also, the theory lacked compelling evidence of the heliocentric hypotheses. in addition, the model was rejected based on the fact that earth rotation cannot be immediately felt. In addition, earth does not have a perfect circular path around the sun. Lastly, the geocentric model makes much sense.
The law of motion which is being described in this scenario is NEWTON THIRD LAW OF MOTION.
Newton third law of motion states that to every action there is an opposite and equal reaction.
Meiosis produce cells with half the chromosomes, because a<span> gamete needs only half the number of chromosomes, because two gametes join together. </span>
