When we speak of the Great Schism<span>, we can actually be referring to one of </span>two schisms<span>. The first is also called the </span>East-West Schism<span> and happened in 1054 when the Byzantine Church broke from the Roman Catholic Church. The second is also referred to as the </span>Great Western Schism<span> and happened between 1378 and 1417 when a pope in Rome and a second pope in Avignon, France, proclaimed themselves to be the real pope. Both schisms </span>significantly affected<span> the Roman Catholic Church. Though, typically, that which is called the Great Schism refers to the </span>East-West Schism.
<span>The </span>greatest effect<span> of the </span>East-West Schism<span> was the creation of two separate churches that had previously been unified under one church, the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church. But more specifically, the schism had developed over time due to "doctrinal, theological, linguistic, political, and geographic" differences; therefore, the schism also affected Catholicism by </span>solidifying these differences<span> (</span>New World Encyclopedia,<span> "Great Schism"</span>).
<span>The greatest </span>theological and political difference<span> concerns the belief in the</span><span> authority of the pope</span><span>. The Roman Catholic Church holds that, as the successor of Saint Peter, the pope holds all authority over the Church. However, the Eastern Church feels the title of pope to be </span>only an honorary one, so the church believes the pope has no authority to "determine policy" for all jurisdictions in the empire ("Great Schism").
A second significant theological difference concerns the<span> objection</span><span> of the</span><span>insertion of the<span> filioque</span> clause</span><span> in the Nicene Creed. The Nicene Creed is the statement of the Catholic Church's faith. The </span>filioque<span> clause refers to a specific statement of faith in the creed concerning the Holy Trinity; more specifically, the statement can be interpreted to mean that the Holy Spirit comes only from the Father or from both the Father and the Son. It is referred to as the filioque clause because the Latin word filioque translates to mean "and from the son." The </span>Eastern Church<span> changed their </span>creed to read<span>, "We believe in the Holy Spirit ... who proceeds from the Father," whereas the </span>Roman Catholic creed reads<span>, "We believe in the Holy Spirit ... who proceeds from the Father and the Son" ("Great Schism"; </span>"Filioque Clause"<span>)</span>
Answer:
Hati and Skoll instead are the two wolves that chase respectively mythology the Moon and the Sun, until the day when they will eat and obscure Heaven and Earth, during the Ragnarök.
Explanation:
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
1. Do you think that the business executive who made this statement would be in favor of or against free trade? What makes you think so?
What I think is that times are changing and are very different from the time of "Made in America."
In this modern-time, globalization rules, and free trade are the direct consequence of globalization. Many American companies have decided to go abroad and built fabrics and industrial plants in other countries because in those developing countries they pay low salaries and can get more profits selling their products. American companies have been greedy too.
2. What do you feel about the number of imported items you can buy in stores? How might free trade affect these numbers?
As I mentioned above, it is part of free trade in a globalized world. Yes, the United States imports many things, but let's remember that the US also exports many goods to other countries. So this is call balance, in which countries negotiate to have a balance in trade. Countries export, yes, but they also have to import goods, so all the countries win.
The best example is the free trade agreement called NAFTA, now USMCA, between México, Canada, and the United States.
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
