i belive the answer is <em><u>447,250 </u></em> of the net income
hope this helped you and make sure to rate this five
Answer:
$2,338
Explanation:
For computing the ending inventory, first we have to determine the average cost per unit, then ending inventory units which are shown below:
= (Beginning inventory units × price per unit + first purchase inventory units × price per unit + second purchase inventory units × price per unit + third purchase inventory units × price per unit) ÷ (Beginning inventory units + one purchase inventory units + second purchase inventory units + third purchase inventory units)
= (11 units × $51 + 15 units × $53 + 21 units × $55 + 17 units × $57) ÷ (11 units + 15 units + 21 units + 17 units)
= ($561 + $795 + $1,155 + $969 ) ÷ (64 units)
= ($3,480) ÷ (64 units)
= $54.375 per unit
Now the ending inventory units would be
= Available units for sale - sale units
= 64 units - 21 units
= 43 units
Now the ending inventory would be
= Ending inventory units × average cost per unit
= 43 units × $54.375 per unit
= $2,338
Answer:
a. $133.51
Explanation:
Selling the stock for a relative amount of money would result in a total price of
$133.51.
I also took the test on e2020
Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
Answer:
The economic surplus will decrease by $2.20
Explanation:
$81.40 and $79.20 are <em>marginal </em>cost and benefit, which are the changes to total costs and total benefits due to producing and consuming one additional barrel of oil.
They can be used to calculate <em>change </em>to economic surplus, which is the change to the net economic value received by society, which is given by:
marginal benefit - marginal cost = $79.20 - $81.40 = - $2.20
