1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Furkat [3]
3 years ago
12

What challenges do australians face today

History
2 answers:
german3 years ago
8 0

Economic Issues including Unemployment, Housing affordability, the Economy in general, Poverty and the gap between the rich and poor were mentioned by 38% of Australians as the most important problems facing Australia.

Even I wish I could help them.

Lady_Fox [76]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The most important Economic and Financial problems facing Australia include Unemployment (13%, up 2%) and the Economy/ Economic problems/ Interest rates (9%, unchanged). Other important sets of issues include Social Issues (13%, up 3%) and Government/ Politics/ Leadership (11%, up 1%).

You might be interested in
What are the principles of ubuntu?<br>​
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

ubuntu is said to include the following values: communality, respect, dignity, value, acceptance, sharing, co-responsibility, humaneness, social justice, fairness, personhood, morality, group solidarity, compassion, joy, love, fulfilment, conciliation, et cetera.

Explanation:

may this answer is helpful for you

8 0
3 years ago
Who is vice President of unite state now?
Annette [7]
The vice president of the United States right now is Mike Pence.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the name of the French minister who tried to bring the United States into a "war against all kings"?
Elan Coil [88]

Answer: D Napoleon

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some Indigenous People welcome the settlers? HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO G
Gnom [1K]

Answer:

pretty sure it was that they needed tools weapons tell me if im wrong

hope it helps

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the united states foreign policy in the middle east changed since the end of the cold war
VLD [36.1K]
On 2 August 1990, the people of Kuwait City awoke at 5am to the sound of Iraqi tanks rolling down their streets. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein intended to annex the small Sheikhdom of Kuwait, Iraq’s “19th province,” and tap its massive oil reserves. The invasion did not come entirely out of nowhere. Iraqi troops were massed at the border as the result of an oil dispute with its tiny neighbor, and the United States tried to persuade Iraq to solve its problems with Kuwait peacefully. This action was the first time one sovereign state had invaded and annexed another since Indonesia annexed East Timor in 1975; and it was the first major challenge to world order since the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall. This chapter examines key events in US foreign policy in the Middle East from Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Iraq in 1990 to Donald Trump’s announcement of US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018. It shows how America’s strong position at the end of the Cold War and the end of Operation Desert Storm in 1991 led to a period of American hyper-involvement in Middle Eastern politics that ultimately weakened its regional standing.

The global reaction to Saddam Hussein’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait was virtually universally negative. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) issued Resolution 660, demanding that “Iraq withdraw immediately and unconditionally all its forces to the positions in which they were located on 1 August 1990.” Saddam Hussein’s blatant act of aggression and territorial aggrandizement put an end to decades of stalemate in the Security Council when the USSR and the US voted together on UNSCR 660.

It was not immediately obvious how the United States would react to Saddam’s aggression; and it was by no means certain that the US had any interest in fighting a war to restore Kuwait’s sovereignty. Congress was divided. The Senate approved the use of force against Iraq by a vote of just 52–47, significantly closer than the 77–23 approval of the 2003 Iraq War. President George H.W. Bush saw an opportunity to establish a “new world order” in which territorial aggrandizement was a product of the past, and adherence to global norms was the wave of the future. He supported a war and it was his decision to make.

Bush wanted a grand coalition operating with UN approval, not a purely American intervention. UNSCR 678 passed on 29 November 1990. It gave Saddam Hussein “one final opportunity” to withdraw from Kuwait. If he did not, the resolution, “Authorize[d] Member States… to use all necessary means” to compel him. “Operation Desert Storm” began on 17 January 1991. Nearly every country in the world joined the coalition – Yemen backed Iraq and Jordan remained neutral. Americans fought alongside 31 diverse countries’ armed forces. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Japan, South Korea, and Germany were the major funders of the war effort. In the end, the US Congress’s General Accountability Office found that Desert Shield and Desert Storm were, “fully financed from allied contributions without using US taxpayer funds” (Conahan 1991, 12). The Warsaw Pact did not provide support, but it did not interfere. The zero-sum world had ended, and the Warsaw Pact dissolved itself on 1 July 1991.

Desert Storm ended on 28 February 1991. Saddam Hussein was still president on 1 March. President Bush and Brent Scowcroft, Bush’s national security advisor, said of the decision not to remove Saddam Hussein from power, “Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream… and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs…. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq…. Had we gone the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land” (“Bush on Iraq” 1998, par. 3). The world would later learn just how accurate that assessment was.

The defeat of Saddam Hussein is often described as the peak of American power and global influence. One headline called it, “the pinnacle of American military supremacy” (Blair 2016). It resulted in the establishment of new American bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia (bases that were soon used to establish “no fly” zones to protect Iraq’s Kurdish and Shia populations), and record personal popularity for President Bush. Bush decided to use the high standing of the United States, and his personal popularity, to bring an end to the Israeli/Arab conflict.

United States support for Israel has been a consistent feature of US foreign policy in the Middle East for more than 40 years. The US/Israel relationship is often portrayed as unwavering, but there are periods of tension and stark disagreements.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • During which time period did the second party system take place in American politics
    9·1 answer
  • What happened in 1758 during the french and indian war
    12·1 answer
  • What women and movements during the Progressive Era helped dispel the stereotype that women were submissive and nonpolitical?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of a domestic policy
    14·2 answers
  • Grant's greatest failing in the scandals that plagued his administration was his a. refusal to turn over evidence to congression
    6·2 answers
  • What sort of work was washington encouraging african americans to do and why
    8·1 answer
  • How did being included with Nintendo's game boy help Tetris become successful?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was employed by both the Aztecs and the Incas?
    10·1 answer
  • What was one important achievement of the greek civilazaition
    9·1 answer
  • The American revolutions WAS NOT a true revolution why?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!