Answer:
This proposal will not work.
Explanation:
All taxes work the same way, it doesn't matter if they are payroll taxes or taxes on goods or services. In this case, labor is the service provided by the employees (suppliers) and the employer is the consumer. A tax increase will reduce the demand for labor, and therefore the equilibrium price of labor (wage) will also decrease. If wages decreases, then workers are not going to be better off, on the contrary they will be worse off. This tax increase will lower both the wage and the employment level.
Answer:
The maximum contribution is $3,850
Explanation:
The contribution eliminate isn't pertinent if the single citizen under age 50 doesn't take an interest in the business supported arrangement and most extreme measure of $5,500 can be asserted for charge year 2019.
As Williams takes an interest in the business supported arrangement and he is under age 50, the IRA contribution will eliminate for money above $63,000 up to $73,000.The most extreme breaking point is $5,500
.
Compute the contribution as follows:
[($66,000 - $63,000) / ($73,000 - $63,000
)] × 100 = 30%,
Thus, 30% contribution will phase out and 70% of maximum limit is allowed. Therefore, maximum contribution is $5,500 x 70%, i.e. $3,850.
Answer:
The answer is A. non-operating expense
Explanation:
As he operates a retail shop, such advertising is vital to attract customers to the shops and to make potential sales. We can't treat this expenses as administration or production expenses.
We consider this as non operational because advertising is not an operational part of the operations of a retail business. Moreover, we can't consider it as selling expenses because they are mostly incurred during the sales process.
Answer: c. capital loss.
Explanation:
A capital loss refers to a scenario where the price of a security falls below the price at which it was purchased. This is what happened to the Alpha Industries stock above as the price dropped from $39 to $37 which led to a capital loss of $2.
The dividends paid seem to outweigh the capital loss but we cannot be certain of this unless we know the tax rate being applied to the dividends and because these are usually high, the after tax dividends might have been lower the capital loss of $2.
The answer I think it is ,is (B.)
