In inductive reasoning, the premises are seen as supplying strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion. The conclusion is definite, but the truth may be probable, based on the available evidence. So she might say, that based on the past history of the company involved, whenever the company is losing money for a given length of time, there are layoffs, so in these similar circumstances it is probable that these planned layoffs will occur.
Answer:
$2.89
Explanation:
The formula and the computation of the earning per share is shown below:
Earning per share = (Net income - preference dividend) ÷ (Number of shares)
where,
Net income is
= $911,300 × 5.87%
= $53,493.31
And, the preference dividend is $0
and, the outstanding number of shares is 18,500
So earning per share is
= $53,493.31 ÷ 18,500 shares
= $2.89
Answer
Option B. Laura is personally liable as the bank, in good faith, thought she is a general partner
Explanation:
Limited Partnership (LP)
This is Business entity that exists in line with state statutes that gives limited liability to some of its members who called limited partners.
RULPA
This is simply called Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. It is the model for Limited Partnership legislation in most states.
Limited Partner
This is a part or member of a limited partnership.it is that individual who is not involved in controlling the business and whose liability is limited to amount invested in the business.
General Partner
It is simply a member in a limited (or general) partnership who controls the business and has unlimited personal liability.
In the above scenario, Laura will be taken as a general partner and will be held personally accountable or liable for the loan, and also along with the general partners of the limited partnership.The rule of RULPA gives the right for a limited partner to be involved in the management of the partnership’s affairs and not losing the limited liability if the limited partner has been formally employed by the partnership to be an executive of the partnership.
An example of accepting liquidated damages is when valerie backed out of the deal and Kenneth kept the earnest deposit.
<h3>What is a
liquidated damages?</h3>
A liquidated damages refers to a pre-estimated probable loss that would be suffered from the late completion of a contract.
In conclusion, the example of accepting liquidated damages is when valerie backed out of the deal and Kenneth kept the earnest deposit.
Read more about liquidated damages
<em>brainly.com/question/25697446</em>
Answer:
$1,000,00
Explanation:
Amount paid to Construction company = $600,000
Additional expenditures in 2021 are Feb 28 = 90,000, Apr. 30 180,000, Jul. 1 = 36,000, Sept. 30 = 64,000. Avoidable interest Cost = 30,000
So, amount to be capitalized in Martin's Building account = $600,000 + $90,000 + $180,000 + $36,000 + $64,000 + $30,000 = $1,000,000
