Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
The answer that you're seeking is, "Trains from different rail lines could use each other’s tracks." The standardization of rails allowed trains to use eachothers tracks and increase speed and efficieny in deliveries. Hope I helped!
Plato de Fondo greatly means the main dish or main course that comes after the entrada.
Entrada is derived from the French word I.e. entrée which extraordinarily means a dish that is being served before the main course. It may be the first dish served or it may follow a soup or other small dish. In the United States and Canada, this term is used for the main dish or the only dish of the meal. In French restaurants, the term is employed for a small dish while in British and American restaurants terms used are starter and appetizer respectively. Modern typical French restaurants have a three-course meal that consists of etrée, appetizer, and Plato De Fonde
For similar questions visit here:
brainly.com/question/6320836
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can answer the following.
Studies have shown that capitalist countries have people living in poverty, and capitalist economies often have a great deal of inequality. If a writer is arguing that capitalism has more benefits than socialism, then this evidence functions as a counterclaim.
In this case, the writer had to give its arguments to rebut that affirmation. The counterclaim occurs when he tries to offset other claims. So after listening to the idea that capitalist countries have people living in poverty, and capitalist economies often have a great deal of inequality, the writer has to offer valid arguments and data to support its idea that capitalism has more benefits than socialism. It could be by numbers, statistics, references, and so on.
We should eradicate social problems and evils from our society because evil is contagoius to adults and little kids ecpecially, who learn even the littlest of things rapidly.
