Answer:
I think it's showing how the Monroe Doctrine was about how "the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers" and that it wouldn't interfere with existing colonies. The picture kind of shows how the two sides are split and not interfering with each other.
Explanation:
Answer:
belief in the afterlife.
Explanation:
Archaeologists have noticed that burying the dead in the ground has been a very old tradition but a special feature added to it during the river valley civilization was that some necessary items of daily life had been added to the grave to help them in their next life. We notice these practices among Sumerians, Mayans, and Harappans. Some historians also believed that underground burials the faith in the next world lies under the Earth and underground burials provide easy access to them.
Answer:
Decentralization: The transfer of control of an activity or organization to several local offices or authorities rather than one single one.
Federal System: When political authority is divided between two autonomous sets of governments, one national and the other subnational, both of which operate directly upon the people.
The difference between a unitary and a federal government is that a unitary government puts its power in one central government while in a federal system the governing power is divided into federal and local governing bodies that connect to the national government.
Answer:
proactive; retroactive
Explanation:
Proactive interference: The term proactive interference refers to the process when an individual's old memories hinder him or her from retaining new memories.
Retroactive interference: The term retroactive interference refers to the process when an individual's new memories hinder him or her from retaining old memories. In other words, the new memories of a person disrupts the old memories.
In the question above, Katie is experiencing proactive interference, whereas Laurel is experiencing retroactive interference.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
