Answer:
Parliament
Explanation:
The bicameral system is a system in which the Parliament is divided into two chambers. The two chambers are usually organized in a manner of lower and upper dome. The two chambers work separately from each other, but are dependent on each other, as one of them can not pass a law without the permission of the other. This type of system is implemented so that there can never be a situation where one political side can have too much power and to be able to function independently, thus abuse the system. The bicameral system is an excellent system to protect the people and their interests.
"Variation allows some individuals to survive better than others and so evolve over time" is the reason this <span>this idea important to his theory of evolution. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope the answer comes to your help.</span>
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
The last time I experienced ineffective communication was when I tried talking to my younger sibling on the dangers of anger. I had noticed that she always threw tantrums and would always get angry when she did not get her way.
1. The communication was ineffective because I used bogus words which she found difficult to understand. In a statement I made, I mentioned that 'anger was inimical and detrimental as it predisposes a person to health issues which could lead to death'. This sentence was ineffective as she did not understand the meaning of inimical and detrimental and the possibility of death scared her.
2. The encoding and decoding stages were problematic. The encoding stage was problematic because I did not really understand the level of knowledge of my receiver. The decoding stage was also problematic because the receiver was lost as to the meaning of the words I used and misinterpreted the message.
3. Filtering is the withholding of information by a sender because he feels the receiver might not need the information. I filtered the meaning of the big words I used which were not age-appropriate.
4. I should have used words that would be understood by a five-year-old. This means that instead of using inimical and detrimental, I would have used bad or not good. Death was also not a good example to have used. I would have said that anger would make us not to be loved by our friends or any other lighter example.
