Hi!
<em>Option C is correct.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation of the choices:
A. - This seems a good choice, however it's not the best choice. Let's come back to it.
B. - This is the best choice because they get to experience first-hand how to manage and make their own money decisions. Choice A might seem good at first, but we can see this is better because they get to make their own decisions and experience hands-on how to do it.
C - This is not a good choice, because it's best to expose children early so they can grow up knowing how to do it.
D - This choice doesn't make sense. What is the point of money if you store it away and don't spend it? This will likely not be a good lesson in the future.
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
Bond price= $1,210.4
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Coupon rate= 0.079/2= 0.0395
YTM= 0.056/2= 0.028
Face value= $1,000
n= 13*2= 26
<u>To calculate the price of the bond, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Bond Price= cupon*{[1 - (1+i)^-n] / i} + [face value/(1+i)^n]
Bond price= 39.5*{[1 - (1.028^-26)]/0.028} + [1,000 / 1.028^26]
Bond price= 722.67 + 487.73
Bond price= $1,210.4
Answer: False
Explanation:
Classification shifting is a method used whereby the core earnings are manipulated by misclassifying the items in the income statement.
One way that managers make use of classification shifting is by reporting the operating expenses for the business as nonoperating expenses. This is usually done in order to inflate the operating income.
The statement in the question is false as classification shifting by managers doesn't lead to under-reporting of total expenses and over-statement of bottom-line net income rather it lead to over reporting.
In cases where an organization decrease it economic activity and have major cutbacks, it is expected that employees will be laid off. Laying off may lead to an increase of unemployment rate in a certain country in which it will have bigger scale of effects in taxes, bills to pay and as especially if they have families or dependents.
Answer: Most tax breaks reduce taxable income, but reducing taxable income below zero does not reduce the tax bill.
Explanation:
Tax breaks can be used to reduce your taxable income sometimes all the way to zero. This however simply means that you don't have to pay income tax but does not mean that there won't be other taxes to pay.
Because of these additional taxes left to pay, a person will still pay certain taxes even if their taxable income is below zero. Tax expenditures therefore do not help much with a federal tax bill of zero.
