Answer: A summary could be followed by a Conclusion, at least it seems reasonable if you get up and have something to say, something of enough importance to convey, you certainly can summarize what you tried to get across, and lastly provide a conclusion to make the Speech and your point of giving it, (at last complete), with a Conclusion.
This is simply my opinion, and I am not referencing any “rule book”, just what I find to be reasonable.
A final Conclusion would by this time,
allow the listener to evaluate all the speaker had said and why. It would have a greater purpose beyond a mere exercise.
This is, again, simply my view on the question and a proposed answer.
Explanation:
Answer: The state of being
He engages the audience in the first paragraph by adding short sentences and engages the audience in the second paragraph by getting the reader to participate in the text.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- In the first paragraph, McPhee presents a series of short sentences, which generate a certain degree of anxiety and curiosity in the reader about the text.
- In addition, it presents the main subject of the text, right in the first sentence, which is capable of attracting the reader's attention.
- In the second paragraph, he places the reader as part of the text, making the reader feel that he or she is the writer who has a block that does not allow him or her to write.
With that, we can affirm that McPhee involves the public, creating anxiety in the reader and then involving the reader in the situation that provokes this anxiety.
This question is about the text "Draft No. 4" written by John McPhee.
More information:
brainly.com/question/20835799?referrer=searchResults
I believe it's B. It seems to be the only one that is very blunt and uses a different tone from the other sentences.
