<h2>Please mark me brainliest because I worked hard on this and it took me almost 15 mins, I gave a deep explanation, and also I was the first person to answer lol. :)</h2>
Answer:
the answer is the second one. (ugly : pretty : ::tall :short)
Explanation:
Definition of Analogy- a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
Here is an example sentence- "an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
The reason why I chose the second answer is because it is comparing beauty/society. Like for example, "alissa is tall, but sam is short" or "Emily is ugly, but Jessica is pretty". These are all comparisons.
I didn't choose the first answer (dog : cat :: cat : mouse) because it is just saying opposites and it is not comparing, it is naming animals.
I didn't choose the third one (brush: comb :: broom: sweep) because, again, they are only naming objects.
I didn't choose the fourth one (yellow : bright :: one : little) because its not comparing and its just naming random things that don't even go together lol
Television promoted patriotism so is is d
<em>Which sentence in this blog entry by a child development specialist most clearly contains logos, or a logical appeal? </em>
<em>The correct answer is C. Researchers conducted in the institute of education by Dr. Alice Sullivan showed that children who read more are likely to do better at school than others.</em>
<em>This sentence uses logos to appeal to the minds of the parents who are listening to the specialist. When the specialist says “Researchers”, he or she is saying that people that really know about this subject have an opinion on the subject. That it is not only the specialist who claims that children who read more do better at school. Moreover, when the specialist says that “in the institute of education” he or she intends to convey that the research was made in a very important place that gives real credit and a warrant to it. In addition, the use of the name of the researcher warrants that someone with a professional background an experience made the specific research. In spite of the specialist not showing the research to the parents, the parents can infer that they can have that evidence, "the research", to support the specialist's claim.</em>
C) He gives examples of denied citizenship rights.
