In the state and area where the crime took place. If a crime is committed in one area, it’s not fair for them to give a trial in an area in which the crime wasn’t located.
<span>Well mostly, people identify more strongly with regional and ethnic groups than with the nation...perhaps I'd go with the option A.</span>
<span>A. Both sides understood the war would be long and bloody. I just took this the correct answer is A.</span>
Answer:
The Amritzar or Jallianwala Bagh massacre took place in Jallianwala Bagh – India on April 13, 1919. A short history of the events at that time indicates that Colonel Reginald Dyer during that day that was marking the New Year for the Sikhs, and due to the curfew prohibiting a group of 4 or more meeting in public, he ordered to open fire to the people gathered together at Jallianwala Bagh listening to a meeting taking place that may result in riots and protests and killing more than a thousand unarmed civilians.
I certainly agree this act was coward and a shame to the British Army. The action taken by colonel Dyer (The Butcher of Amritzar) is considered now a day’s an act of genocide, violating the basic principles of human rights, there was no honor and no values in killing civilians just because their right to meet publicly in disagreement with the British rule.
Answer:
"British imperialism in India had impacted the nation adversely. ....They were uniting hands for freedom and from time-to-time Indian history had seen many struggles for freedom."
Explanation:
hope this helps and feel free to add brainiest
